Skip to content
  • About us
  • Contact the Editor
  • Guest writers
  • Advertise
  • Special features
  • The Psychologist
  • Join the BPS
  • Jobs in Psychology

Research Digest

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Mail Chimp
  • Digest App for iOS / Android
  • PsychCrunch Podcast
  • Our Weekly Email
  • Main Categories
    • Personality
    • Cognition
    • Social
    • Mental health
    • Features
    • Developmental
    • guest blogger
    • Methods
    • Emotion
    • Brain
    • Teams
    • Occupational
Cognition, Developmental, Lying, Political; Social August 25, 2015October 11, 2018

How do lying skill and frequency change through life, from childhood to old age?

Young adults – defined here as people aged 18 to 29 – are the most skilled liars, while teens are the most prolific. That’s according to a new study published in Acta Psychologica that claims to be the first ever to investigate lying behaviour across the entire lifespan.

The research involved members of the public who were visitors at the Science Centre NEMO in Amsterdam. In all, 1005 people took part, aged from 6 to 77. To test lying ability, Evelyne Debey and her colleagues presented the participants with simple general knowledge questions (e.g. “Can pigs fly?”). These questions had to be answered as quickly as possible, either truthfully or dishonestly, depending on the colour of the YES/NO response options. Taking the pig question as an example, the idea is that a skilled liar ought to be able to answer “yes” very quickly, whereas a poor liar will be delayed when answering dishonestly, or they might even give a reflex honest answer.

Young adults showed the fastest reaction times and lowest error rates on this test of lying. Overall, lying proficiency showed an inverted U-shaped curve through the lifespan, improving through childhood, peaking in young adulthood and then gradually declining into old age. This meant that lying proficiency was the same in the youngest children (aged 6 to 8) as it was in the eldest participants (aged 60 plus).

To measure lying frequency, the researchers asked their participants to report the number of lies they had told during the preceding 24 hours to different people in different situations (e.g. to a stranger or relative; face to face or online), and to describe those lies. Overall, the participants reported telling an average of two lies during that time, which is consistent with past research. Teens admitted to telling more lies (an average of 2.8) than any of the other age groups. Again there was an inverted U-shaped relationship between age and lying such that lying frequency increased during childhood, peaked in adolescence, then decreased through life, so that the oldest group lied with the same frequency as the youngest participants.

The researchers have a theory that the reason lying skill and frequency show this pattern through the lifespan is because of age-related changes in inhibitory control – the idea being that to lie successfully you need to be able suppress the truth, and that young adults have the most inhibitory control.

To test this, the researchers had the same participants complete what’s known as a “stop-signal task” – this involved pressing a button to indicate as fast as possible whether an X or an O had appeared on-screen. Crucially, on 25 per cent of these trials a tone sounded that told them to cancel their response. The later this tone sounded, the harder it is to withhold a response. Participants with greater inhibitory control can usually cancel their response even when the stop signal is given very late.

The participants’ ability on this stop-signal task increased through childhood and peaked in young adulthood. However, performance after this age remained relatively stable. Moreover, performance on the stop-signal task did not correlate strongly with lying proficiency. This appears to undermine the researchers’ theory about inhibitory control, but they argued that there are different types of inhibitory control and that perhaps a different measure of a different kind of inhibition (such as the Stroop Test, which measures the ability to deal with interfering mental demands) would have correlated more strongly with lying ability.

In a field that so often relies on student research participants, this study stands out for its involvement of the general public across wide range of ages. However, as the researchers acknowledge, the findings come with many caveats. Among these is the fact the study was cross-sectional – it doesn’t tell us anything about how the same people’s propensity for, and ability to, lie changes as they age. Also, the test of lying ability was artificial and involved none of the emotional consequences of real-life lies. Note too that, as shown in past research, lying frequency was highly skewed so that half the participants reported telling no lies in the previous 24 hours, and over 50 per cent of the lies were told by prolific liars who made up just 9 per cent of the sample.

_________________________________

Debey, E., De Schryver, M., Logan, G., Suchotzki, K., & Verschuere, B. (2015). From junior to senior Pinocchio: A cross-sectional lifespan investigation of deception Acta Psychologica, 160, 58-68 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.06.007

Christian Jarrett (@Psych_Writer) is Editor of BPS Research Digest

Our free fortnightly email will keep you up-to-date with all the psychology research we digest: Sign up!

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

3 Comments

Post navigation

← Previous Post

People’s "coming out" experiences are related to their psychological wellbeing years later

Next Post →

Having a brain scan changed how these children think about minds and brains

3 thoughts on “How do lying skill and frequency change through life, from childhood to old age?”

  1. Pingback: What are we like? 10 Psychology Findings That Reveal The Worst Of Human Nature – Research Digest
  2. Pingback: What are we like? 10 psychology findings that reveal the worst of human nature | Unhinged Group
  3. Pingback: What is Human Nature? Findings from Psychology – O Society

Comments are closed.

Popular now
  • Spotting Liars And Fixing Things: The Week's Best Psychology Links
    Spotting Liars And Fixing Things: The Week's Best Psychology Links
  • We Have Many More Than Five Senses — Here's How To Make The Most Of Them
    We Have Many More Than Five Senses — Here's How To Make The Most Of Them
  • People with "Maladaptive Daydreaming" spend an average of four hours a day lost in their imagination
    People with "Maladaptive Daydreaming" spend an average of four hours a day lost in their imagination
  • Some perfectly healthy people can't remember their own lives
    Some perfectly healthy people can't remember their own lives
  • Psychology's 10 Greatest Case Studies – Digested
    Psychology's 10 Greatest Case Studies – Digested
Our Blog Stats
  • 20,346,263 hits since we joined WordPress in August 2016
Recent posts
  • We’re Worse At Remembering Exactly What We’ve Given To Friends Than What We’ve Given To Strangers
  • Spotting Liars And Fixing Things: The Week’s Best Psychology Links
  • We Have A Strong Urge To Find Out What Might Have Been — Even When This Leads To Feelings Of Regret
  • When People Hold Morally-Based Attitudes, Two-Sided Messages Can Encourage Them To Consider Opposing Viewpoints
  • Bullying Between “Frenemies” Is Surprisingly Common
Archive
Search
Follow Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook
Browse posts by category
Alcohol Anger Anniversary Announcements Autism Babies biological Brain bullying Cognition Comparative Competitions Creativity Cross-cultural Dating Decision making Developmental Eating Educational Emotion environmental evolutionary psych Extras Facebook Faces Feast Feature Football Forensic Gender Genetics guest blogger Health Illusions In Brief Intelligence Language Laughter leadership Lying Media Memory Mental health Methodological Methods Misogyny Money Morality Music Occupational One nagging thing Perception Personality Podcast Political Positive psychology Psychosis Psych to rescue Qualitative Reading Religion Replications Sex Sin Week Sleep and dreaming Social Special Issue Spotter Sport Suicide/ self-harm Teams Technology Terrorism Therapy The self Thought Time Twitter Uncategorized Unusual case studies Weekly links
Get our free weekly email
Join 60,000+ smart subscribers!
Find us on
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Mail Chimp
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: