People Who See God As A White Man Tend To Prefer White Men For Leadership Positions

By Matthew Warren

When you picture God, who do you see: a young black woman, or an old white man? Chances are it’s the latter — and a new study in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology suggests that that image has its consequences.

Across a series of seven studies, at team led by Steven O Roberts at Stanford University found that the way that we perceive God — and in particular our beliefs about God’s race — may influence our decisions about who should be in positions of leadership more generally.

First, the team examined how 444 American Christians — a mixture of men and women, some black and some white — pictured God. In their “indirect” measure, the researchers asked participants to view 12 pairs of faces that differed either in age (young vs old), race (white vs black), or gender (man vs woman), and pick the photo of each pair they thought looked more like God. Participants were also asked to explicitly rate God on each of these characteristics (e.g. whether they thought God was more likely white or black).

On both measures, participants were more likely to see God as old than young, and male rather than female. But participants’ view of God’s race depended on their own race: white participants tended to see God as white, while black participants tended to see God as black.

So people clearly conceptualise God in a specific way — but how does this relate to decisions they make in their everyday lives? For Christians, God is the ultimate leader, so perhaps they look for the characteristics they ascribe to God in other leaders too. So in a second study, the team asked more than 1,000 participants to complete the same direct and indirect measures as before, as well as a new task in which they imagined working for a company that was looking for a new supervisor. They saw 32 faces that varied in gender and race and had to rate how well each person would fit the position.

The team found that when participants saw God as white, they tended to give white candidates a higher rating compared to black candidates. The reverse was true too: participants who saw God as black tended to rate black candidates as more suited than white ones. People who saw God as male also rated males higher than females. A subsequent study found that even children aged 4 to 12 generally perceived God as male and white, and those who conceptualised God as white also viewed white people as more boss-like than black people.

The results suggest that the extent to which people see God as white and male predicts how much they will prefer white men for leadership roles. Interestingly, these effects held even after controlling for measures of participants’ racial prejudice, sexism and political attitudes, suggesting that the effects couldn’t simply be explained by these kinds of biases. Of course, when people saw God as black, these effects were reversed, with participants preferring black candidates. But the fact is that in America, the idea that God is white is a “deeply rooted intuition”, the authors write, and so this conceptualisation could potentially reinforce existing hierarchies that disadvantage black people.

However, there’s a big limitation here: these studies were all based on correlations between beliefs about God and beliefs about who should be leaders. That is, it wasn’t clear whether perceptions of God’s race actually cause people to prefer certain leaders or whether there’s something else going on that could explain the link between the two.

To address this question of causality, the team turned to made-up scenarios, in which participants had to judge who made good rulers based on the characteristics of a deity. Participants read about a planet inhabited by different kinds of aliens — “Hibbles” or “Glerks” — who all worshipped a Creator. People tended to infer whether Hibbles or Glerks should rule over the planet depending on whether the Creator itself was Hibble or Glerk.

These final studies provide some evidence that the ways in which people picture God, or at least an abstract God-like being, do indeed filter down to actively influence beliefs and decisions in other areas of their lives. The authors suggest that future work should look at how to prevent people making these kinds of inferences.

Of course, the research focuses on a specific group: all participants lived in America, and in most studies they were Christian (some of the later studies also included atheists). It remains to be seen whether similar patterns exist amongst adherents of other religions, or in countries with different demographics. It would also be important to figure out whether perceptions of God influence decisions in the real world, and not just in the lab.

Still, as the authors write, the results “provide robust support for a profound conclusion: beliefs about who rules in heaven predict beliefs about who rules on earth.”

God as a White Man: A Psychological Barrier to Conceptualizing Black People and Women as Leadership Worthy

Matthew Warren (@MattbWarren) is Editor of BPS Research Digest

9 thoughts on “People Who See God As A White Man Tend To Prefer White Men For Leadership Positions”

  1. For one, there’s far more races than ‘white’ and ‘black’, which aren’t even races. For two, this simply demonstrates something called ‘group bias’ which everyone is guilty of and of which fuels what some people like to reduce to ‘racism’ due to lack of knowing more about human nature. People also like to distinguish between ‘racism’, ‘sexism’, and ‘politism’ (a word I coined for all these people that can’t get along with someone of differing political beliefs) when they’re really all ‘isms’, which means they don’t even exist: all that exists is the primary category called ‘group bias’ that creates those isms. Here’s a must more extensive look at the issue: ‘Politism: The New ‘ism’ http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewarticle.asp?id=79235

    Like

  2. This is a deeply confused and incoherent study with absurd, and clearly false conclusions. If “God” refers to the God of the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), the question “When you picture God, who do you see?” is absurd, for the simple reason that none of the above faiths allows the possibility of seeing God (at least in the normal sense of the word) and whatever disagreement there is about the nature of God there is total agreement on one thing: God is not an instance of homo sapiens, and therefore is neither male or female, nor black or white. The central question of the study is absurd, theologically and philosophically speaking. It is alarming that this doesn’t seem to be recognised by the authors nor the BPS Research Digest. In case of Christianity, with its unique doctrines of the Trinity and Incarnation, there are some additional complexities but in none of the Abrahamic religions the question posed makes any sense; the only possible answer to the question “When you picture God, who do you see: a young black woman, or an old white man?” is neither – God is not a human being, needless to say! (I hold a first in philosophy and theology and a research MA in philosophy).

    Like

    1. If only this were the case – most liturgy in Christian churches uses the male pronoun and male gendered words to describe God

      Like

      1. It is the case. The liturgy does indeed use the male pronoun – mainly because there is no (easy) way to refer to God who is personal but not sexed – but it is a central and fundamental doctrine of all three Abrahamic faiths that God is not a human being (needlessly to say!) and therefore is not of any skin colour or sex. I find it almost incredible that one has to even point this out. And if any theist thinks of God as a “white male” they are hopelessly ignorant of the central doctrine of the faith they claim to profess.

        Like

    2. If a person in the study did not imagine God to be White…. then they would not answer the questions in a way to suggest that they might. The apparent fact that you do not “picture” God in an anthropomorphized form doesn’t mean that others don’t, particularly with hundreds of years of religious art to suggest it.

      Like

  3. People who prefer a white male god as a leader prefer their leaders to be white males fads. Substitute any mix of god, white, male and leader

    Like

Comments are closed.